brightknightie: Nick looking up. (Nick)
I recently replaced my TV (luckily, before tariff announcements). My prior TV was a decade and a half old. Its replacement, a Roku-brand TV, is fully 55" corner to corner and still blowing my mind when I rewatch familiar media on it. For example, rewatching first-season Forever Knight on the much bigger screen, I constantly see props, sets, and expressions more clearly than ever before. Mostly, it's just increased clarity/visibility from sheer size and from fiddling for optimal settings to make the old footage look its best on screens it was never meant for (so far, for '90s shows, I recommend "Movie" for DVDs and "Auto-detect" for streaming). But occasionally I see things I genuinely never knew were there.

For example, rewatching "Dark Knight" (German DVD*), I saw for the first time that Nick's TV stand is on a very low, wooden, wheeled platform, a rough hand-truck seemingly left over from when the warehouse was in use as a warehouse. And on Alyce's desk, next to her apple, which I've always seen, is a modest bran muffin that I didn't recall (FK Alyce's snacks contrast with NK Alyce's ice cream and chips; I do prefer NK's Alyce in every way, as I prefer FK's Janette in every way). In the Raven, I saw clearly for the first time the little flashlights the patrons shine on themselves and each other; before, I'd seen only the lights, not the devices. Most arrestingly, I saw, for what felt like the first time, that when Schanke and Nick go up the staircase to stop the crazed shooter in the apartment building in the Chinese neighborhood, and Schanke says, "It's just a little plasma, Knight; don't get all worked up" -- a line I believe is straight from the original Nick Knight script, where this scene happens in a health club and is pretty different -- they are not stepping around only blood on the stairs, but around a young woman's dead body. "Just a little plasma?" I know Schanke means, "Keep moving, Knight; we can't afford to get distracted now [with bonus vampire allusion]," but... perhaps that line should have been rewritten for how the scene was re-staged. Ugh.

Have you had similar experiences with old stories on new devices?

* Ages ago, when some companies maybe didn't realize the full implications of publishing factory reset codes, I unlocked a DVD player to make it region-agnostic. The FK German DVDs have all the visual footage of the initial Canadian airings, which were of course significantly the longest of the many North American cuts over the years -- plus the scenes, mostly just longer establishing shots, that are truly unique to the German cuts -- but very unfortunately the English audio track for those pivotal scenes from the initial Canadian airings is missing from the German DVDs, just as those whole scenes are missing entirely from the North American DVDs and streaming. (My ancient unlocked DVD player needed an adapter to work with the new TV. This is fine.)
brightknightie: At dawn, a white knight raises her lance (Default)
[community profile] snowflake_challenge '25: A fannish opinion that changed over time

I'll share one opinion and one practice.

Changed opinion: Lacroix. Back when I was a fandom newbie and watching Forever Knight backward -- that is, from S3 in syndication, to Nth-gen S2 VHS tapes generous folks mailed me for the cost of materials and postage, to Nth-gen S1 VHS tapes from different generous folks -- and there were yet episodes that I had not seen, I... founded the Light Cousins and Faithfuls. Sorry! My ill-founded opinion at that time was that the Lacroix character could feasibly and usefully be approached as capable of reform, ideally through his feelings for other characters, especially Fleur and Nick. I was wrong. That's not a useful or supportable approach to the canon story structure or the character's role within it. Of course individual fan writers can and should create such stories as excellent fanfic! But for myself, I reject and disavow that approach. It is not my cup of Ribena. Lacroix is and should be a villain, both a metaphorical representation or mechanism of whatever real-world evil canon is grappling with that week and a practical plot lever to impede or inform Nick's long, hard road toward eventual heroic victory.

Changed practice: Disclaimers. While I always include endnotes on fanworks -- temporarily refraining in anonymous exchanges -- they've shortened greatly over the decades and, in my most recent three works, I've finally found a fully satisfactory substitute for the ancient "Disclaimer" opening. To back up, coming out of paper zine days, it was customary to state that TPTB owned the IP (and no profit was being made, etc.). (Few do that anymore. TPTB know what fanfic is now.) But that's only one of three reasons I've always been such an endnotes fiend. The second, you can guess: academia trained me to cite my sources and to feel anxiety about not doing so accurately and comprehensively. The third ... back in '96 -- two years before Google would be founded, when search was barely a function -- when I had shared all of 2 or 3 short fanfics on FKFic-L, and had given the original FTP Site archivist permission to host them, that was when a stranger who shared my wallet surname -- which was on those posts then because (a) I didn't yet know better and (b) my university, also not yet knowing better, used our wallet names as our email addresses -- searched up those stories and emailed me assuming that I believed in vampires for real and other upsetting things. Long story short, one lesson I took away was to clarify on fanfic that I know the difference between fiction and reality. I've continued all these years, through various boilerplate formulas. My newest, simplest, endnotes opener is: "I wrote this fanfic of [IP] in [Month / season / event]." I'm pleased with this approach. We'll see how it wears.

brightknightie: Schanke in a Hawaiian shirt at the Dolph Inn (Schanke)
Oh, wow. I just today got a joke in FK that I've been missing all these many years. One very specific joke. From the tag of s01e11 "The Hunters." You probably understood this joke the first time you saw the episode! But I don't have the most keen social insight. All this time, I've vaguely wondered what was up with that exchange; did one of the actors blow a line, or was it just written a little awkwardly? No, no, it was entirely me not getting the joke:
NICK: All I'm saying is that Anderson was right. There's more to being a good cop than picking up dead bodies. And you're a good cop.

SCHANKE: Is this a compliment? I'll try not to get a swelled head.

NICK: You want me to tell you the truth?

SCHANKE: Yeah. Yeah, I want the truth.

NICK: You lost that battle a long time ago, Doughnut.

I take some comfort in that Schanke perhaps doesn't immediately get the joke, either. He looks confused!

The joke is that "the battle" Schanke lost "a long time ago" is to "not get a swelled head." It has nothing to do with being "a good cop," which is what Schanke was fishing for. After giving Schanke several paragraphs of unusually supportive reassurance after the episode's traumatic events, Nick pivots to making fun of Schanke in their more usual dynamic.

Facepalm. How could I have never grasped this before? But I do now, and it's lovely. First-season FK. Seriously. So good! Always. :-D

brightknightie: Nick raising his hand to touch the screen from the wrong side. (Nick Again)
The past few months, I haven’t happened to see any FK discussion, so I thought I might try to share something I’ve been thinking about. Perhaps some of you might like to share your own very different takes on your own journals? It’s risky, though. This is an opinion, and a less than popular one, at that. Um. Please don’t hurt me? Or each other!

I love Forever Knight. Let’s start there! That’s not controversial. FK is my all-time favorite television show. History, mystery, metaphysics. Its first season is by far my favorite of its three seasons. And Nick, its protagonist, whom I see as both an essential everyman struggling toward salvation and a noble hero in the undertow of a dark night of the soul, is my favorite of its characters. FK at its best is brilliant, supple, satisfying storytelling, rich in overlapping genres, metaphors, and lessons. And, at its best, it’s amazingly, unusually, insightfully pro-woman (not just for its time and genre, but especially considering those). All these years later, I never cease to be delighted, comforted, and grateful to all of you who love FK along with me -- all, no matter how we each individually see our FK.

And that’s always been a thing, hasn’t it? FK fandom has disagreed on how to fundamentally interpret the show since at least the second-season premiere, when the series tone shifted like a tectonic plate. It’s not just that some of us prefer the history to the mystery, or the mystery to the horror, or the horror to the metaphysics, or the metaphysics to the romance, or the romance to the adventure. It’s not just that we have different favorite characters, seasons, episodes, and themes. It’s also that some of us feel that Nick is right to save lives, atone for his sins, strive for humanity, and turn his back on vampirism, while others… don’t.

Read more... )

brightknightie: Janette and Schanke in the Raven (LaCroissant)
What are a couple of your personally least-favorite episodes or scenes of Forever Knight? Why those?

Define "least favorite" however you like! Worst executed. Worst concept. Best try that fell flattest. The one you watched when you had food poisoning and can't think of without feeling ill again. ;-) But if a particular episode element -- a scene, a trope, an omission, a logic failure, a contradiction, a missed opportunity -- especially bugs you, that's really what I have in mind today.

I'm brainstorming for FKFicFest. I've found over the years that arguing a point is often my personal readiest spark. For example, the story I wrote last year came completely from cringing my way through a re-watch of "Trophy Girl," which I see as not just an illogical mess, but a wasted opportunity that could have been great if only it had taken its own investigation seriously and not wallowed with the irrelevant imprisoned character (Nick doesn't need anyone to tell him how serial killers think) (also, "Crazy Love" did it better) (and so did "Love You to Death"). For another example -- not mine this time -- "Be My Valentine" launched a thousand fics arguing passionately against its apparent supposition that Natalie could be hypnotized despite the evidence of "Only the Lonely" and "A More Permanent Hell" (and thus it's become deep, wide fanon that Natalie was drugged and/or faking).

I'm curious what comes to mind for you! Thank you!

Tracy's bicycle

Saturday, May 8th, 2021 11:36 am
brightknightie: Tracy at the railroad tracks with snow (Winter)
Did you remember that Tracy has a bicycle? It's against the white wall perpendicular to her front door in her brightly-lit apartment entryway, where some folks might put a coat rack, shoe rack, umbrella stand, small table to drop keys on, or the like.

(I had occasion to rewatch "Avenging Angel." That prop leaped out at me as if I'd never seen it before.)

Off the top of my head, I don't recall any stories ever mentioning Tracy as a bicyclist, neither as a sport, a hobby, nor just an occasional way of getting around. It could be something she used to do but doesn't anymore for some reason. Or it could be something she still does all the time off-screen.

This of course brings to mind Nick's never-used-on-screen motorcycle, and Vachon's rarely-used-on-screen motorcycle. Maybe the show couldn't afford the insurance for bicycle riding, either. But such a reference for the character could have been an excellent thing, to round her out more. We got precious few canonical indications of how she spent her time outside work, or whether she put anything aside when she became a homicide detective and gained that wrinkle in her reality.

brightknightie: Tracy in her kitchen, while Vachon is in her fridge (Tracy)
When brainstorming for [community profile] fkficfest converged with certain real-world events, I discovered that while I remembered that Tracy shooting someone in the line of duty was the impetus for the "Trophy Girl" plot, I did not remember whom she'd shot, or why, or what happened to that person. That was unsettling! Why couldn't I remember? I determined to re-watch "Trophy Girl."

So, after putting it off for a while, I tried -- tried! -- to re-watch "Trophy Girl" last night. Um. "Trophy Girl" is now my least-favorite episode in the entire series. Good grief. To fulfill my purpose, I did re-watch every Tracy scene. But I had to skip the scenes in the prison. And I could barely cringe through some of the other scenes. There are bits of this episode that do good things! But they are swamped by two wrongheaded tides poorly overlaid, and not helped by the conventions of '90s syndicated television and the expectations of the USA network. Ick.

You can take for granted that I find the flashback thematically hollow and aggravating. Apparently, its story purpose is to further parallel Nick -- Nick, as much or more than Lacroix -- with the present-day villains. Why? What's the point of that? A first-season episode would let Nick learn a lesson from that; this third-season episode's text offers no learning to the character, only disgust to the viewer. Sure, we can build a thematic subtext ourselves; we're very good at that! But the filmed version fails. What did Nick learn from that past event? A better story would have fit in an impact on the character.

More importantly, we have Tracy, who by the end of this episode has ended two human lives in service of the "she really is a good cop; believe us as we tell you this over and over in so many words" effort.

Having Tracy deal with the psychological impact of killing -- even in the line of duty, even as indisputable necessity in the moment to save lives -- could have been a spectacular episode, could have paralleled with Nick not wanting to kill, could have explored and built character! Did it? No. She claims killing didn't phase her. No one tells her that it should phase her, that she should need a pause for reflection. Reese or Nick should have told her that, but they didn't. Maybe her relatives or friends, but no. Instead, she throws herself into an unauthorized dangerous situation in a foolish way without backup -- attempting to prove herself, pushing back on what she mistakenly sees as a suspension, which misperception could have been a powerful pivot, more important and interesting than the prison scenes -- and then she ends up killing again. And what lesson does the character take from all of this? How does she get to grow or develop? None. She doesn't. In the end, Natalie tells us that Tracy was taken to the hospital -- off screen -- and that's that, never again do we hear about any of this. What was the story deliverable? That Tracy can shoot and is oversensitive to thinking she is being treated differently than others? We already knew those things. How was repeating them like this worth this set-up?

Oh, the person killed at the start of the episode? We learn that he was a drug dealer. We don't learn anything else about him. Not even his name. Not even the specific crime. The episode opens with Nick and Tracy chasing him and another man. Nick manages to apprehend his guy unharmed. Tracy ends up in an alley with hers. He shoots at her; she shoots back; he dies.

brightknightie: Lacroix looking through the chain curtain at the Raven (Lacroix)
For those who like to ponder events in the existence of FK's Lacroix and Divia characters, I recently read an essay that might interest you: "How a Disaster Relief Program Changed the Roman Empire for the Better: Pompeii may symbolize catastrophe, but its aftermath provides a blueprint for rebuilding" by Annalee Newitz in The New York Times, March 6, 2021.

We naturally often focus on Pompeii for what existed before the Vesuvius eruption and what people suffered during the disaster. I, at least, had not thought to look into what happened after. According to this essay, many interesting things, including a relief and redistribution program about which Lacroix is sure to have had opinions. (I couldn't say whether Divia had opinions; she's an adolescent infused with terrible power and primordial evil; she probably didn't care much about economic and social structures.)

some excerpts from the essay )

Pets in FK and HL

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2020 08:01 am
brightknightie: Natalie and her cat Sidney (Pets)
Something that [personal profile] leela_cat said made me realize for the very first time: There are no pets in all 6+ seasons of HL, but there are fairly many pets in 3 seasons of FK, for a TV show.

To be more precise, except for those with the K-immie in "Leader of the Pack," I remember no named or otherwise non-utilitarian animals in all of HL. We have many horses, of course, but the horses are strictly transportation, less thought-of than the characters' modern-day cars.

Granted that the animals in FK are also less thought-of than some of the characters' cars -- ahem, Caddy ;-) -- nevertheless, Natalie has her cat, Sidney, who appears in one episode and is referenced in 2 more (if I remember correctly). While Perry is a working dog, he is named and a character unto himself, and Nick's Ralegh is surely a pet. Tracy refers to getting a puppy as a gift for someone else. Schanke makes a joking reference to a pet dog (the line is something like, "gotta get home, kiss the wife, kick the dog").

Animals are difficult to have on set. Movies, TV shows, theaters all tend to avoid animals when not absolutely necessary to a story. And neither HL nor (much more so) FK were rolling in funding in '90s syndication. But FK's writers repeatedly referred to pets in their story universe. HL's did not.

Interesting! What do you think?

brightknightie: Nick raising his hand to touch the screen from the wrong side. (Nick Again)
As you probably know, when a copy of the script for the third-season FK episode "Dead of Night" by Michael Sadowski came into fannish hands back in the day, it contained a scene that had not appeared in the final filmed version, a flashback scene of Nick and Lacroix practicing with swords while talking.

The scene was shared via FK email lists at the time. People were eager to read what became known as "the lost swordfight scene" (although we actually know some of its lines from other, filmed scenes, and the script was rewritten over it). I personally don't love the scene for several overarching FK interpretation reasons. But, important to me, personally: one of its implied elements may possibly have influenced or converged with some of Susan G.'s thinking leading up to her never-finished (but posted to her site before she died) third Dorian-the-Archivist novel, Noble Mind.

This came up not long ago in a conversation with [profile] pj228. I said that, if I remembered correctly, the scene had been shared on the email lists. Long story short, my own personal PC is up and running again, and I am able to share that scene. Let me note, first, that this obviously is not canon, and may not be something the writer or director or actors would like to have influence our understanding of the episode or series.

It is interesting, though.

'the lost swordfight scene,' by Michael Sadowski )

Profile

brightknightie: At dawn, a white knight raises her lance (Default)
Amy

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Tags

Style Credit

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated Thursday, May 22nd, 2025 10:37 pm