Even "Capitol Offense" Has Good Points
Saturday, February 2nd, 2008 10:33 pm[Crossposted from forkni-l. In reply to remarks on the second-season episode "Capitol Offense."]
Nick getting away with breaking lots of procedures and perhaps contributing negligently to homicide is just a "little bit"?
Well, yes, in "Capitol Offense," it is, because, as we know, the even bigger reality-defying problem in this episode is that Canada would never extradite someone who faces the death penalty. It's against the law. If "Capitol Offense" had happened in the real Toronto, the Laura Garfield character would probably be behind bars in a Canadian prison to this day, as I understand it. They wouldn't ship her home until Texas gave up the death penalty -- which is to say, never.
But despite that infamous blunder nomination for the wall of shame, I really do love two things about "Capitol Offense." ( Read more... )
Nick getting away with breaking lots of procedures and perhaps contributing negligently to homicide is just a "little bit"?
Well, yes, in "Capitol Offense," it is, because, as we know, the even bigger reality-defying problem in this episode is that Canada would never extradite someone who faces the death penalty. It's against the law. If "Capitol Offense" had happened in the real Toronto, the Laura Garfield character would probably be behind bars in a Canadian prison to this day, as I understand it. They wouldn't ship her home until Texas gave up the death penalty -- which is to say, never.
But despite that infamous blunder nomination for the wall of shame, I really do love two things about "Capitol Offense." ( Read more... )